In the annals of Indian cinema, there are sequels that soar and those that crash and burn. “Indian 2,” the long-awaited follow-up to the 1996 hit “Indian,” falls squarely into the latter category with all the grace of an elephant trying to perform ballet. Director Shankar, once hailed as a visionary, has delivered a film so spectacularly bad it might just redefine the concept of “so bad it’s good.” Spoiler alert: it’s just bad.
The Return of Senapati: Less Vigilante, More Vegetable
Kamal Haasan reprises his role as Senapati, the anti-corruption crusader who once had audiences cheering. This time, he returns looking less like a fearsome vigilante and more like a confused grandfather who wandered onto the wrong movie set. The opening scene teases potential, much like a magician promising to pull a rabbit out of a hat, only to produce a wilted carrot instead.
Haasan’s performance is a far cry from his usual brilliance. It’s as if he’s trying to act through a mask made of old papier-mâché and regret. His emotional range spans from mildly annoyed to slightly more annoyed, with a dash of “why did I agree to this” thrown in for good measure. The prosthetics don’t help, turning the once-fierce Senapati into something that looks like it escaped from a wax museum during a heatwave.
Cast of Thousands in Indian 2 (or at least it feels that way)
The supporting cast is a mixed bag of talent, ranging from scene-stealers to scene-ruiners. Brahmanandam, Vivek, SJ Surya, Priya Bhavani Shankar, and Bobby Simha manage to inject some life into this cinematic corpse. Their performances stand out, much like a clown at a funeral – inappropriate, but at least it gives you something to look at besides the disaster unfolding before you.
Rakul Preet Singh and Siddharth, on the other hand, deliver performances so bland they make unseasoned tofu look spicy. Their characters feel about as necessary to the plot as a screen door on a submarine. One can’t help but wonder if they were added simply to pad the runtime or to give the audience familiar faces to cling to as they drown in a sea of mediocrity.
Shankar’s Indian 2 Descent into Cinematic Madness
What happened to the Shankar who once gave us commercial masterpieces? This film feels like it was directed by his evil twin who not only hates cinema but harbors a personal vendetta against the audience. The song picturizations look like they were lifted straight from a 2004 music video countdown, complete with dated CGI and choreography that makes the Macarena look cutting-edge.
The VFX and graphics are so abysmal they make early 2000s video game cutscenes look like technological marvels. In an age where even low-budget indie films can pull off decent effects, “Indian 2” looks like it was created using a mix of Windows Paint, a flip book, and sheer audacity. The de-aging effects on Kamal Haasan are particularly egregious, making him look less like a younger version of himself and more like a melting wax figure with a bad wig.
Music: A Diamond in a Landfill
Amidst this dumpster fire of a film, Anirudh Ravichander’s music stands out like a gourmet meal at a fast-food joint. It’s almost cruel how good the soundtrack is, serving as a constant reminder of what could have been if the rest of the production had matched its quality. Listening to Ravichander’s score while watching the film is like having a world-class orchestra play at your high school talent show – impressive, but ultimately out of place.
Nostalgia: When the Past Should Stay in the Past
The film attempts to capitalize on nostalgia, integrating the BGM and references from “Indian” with all the subtlety of a sledgehammer to the face. It’s as if the filmmakers watched “Ready Player One” and thought, “What if we did that, but badly?” The result is a mishmash of callbacks and references that feel forced and awkward, like your dad trying to use modern slang at a family dinner.
Corruption Sermon: Preaching to the Choir (and the Bored)
If you’ve ever sat through a three-hour lecture on the evils of corruption and thought, “This would make a great action movie,” then boy, does “Indian 2” have a treat for you. The film drags on, hammering its anti-corruption message with the delicacy of a jackhammer at 5 AM. It’s less a movie and more a very long, very expensive PSA that forgot it was supposed to entertain somewhere along the way.
The preachy tone becomes so overbearing that by the end, you might find yourself rooting for corruption just out of spite. At least corrupt politicians don’t subject you to long-winded monologues about their moral superiority – they just take your money and have the decency to lie about it convincingly.
Lost in Translation: The Dubbing Disaster
For Telugu audiences, the dubbed dialogues add another layer of confusion to an already befuddling experience. It’s as if the translators used a combination of Google Translate and a random word generator, resulting in dialogue that makes about as much sense as using a fork to eat soup. Characters speak in a bizarre mishmash of phrases that sound vaguely like Telugu but convey all the meaning of a monkey typing Shakespeare.
This linguistic travesty turns already wooden dialogue into something akin to an alien trying to communicate using only phrases it learned from badly translated fortune cookies. It’s a testament to the actors’ skills that they manage to deliver these lines with straight faces – or perhaps a sign that they’ve simply given up and accepted their fate.
The Promise of “Indian 3”: A Threat, Not a Treat
Just when you think it can’t get any worse, “Indian 2” ends with a trailer for “Indian 3.” This preview feels less like a promise of better things to come and more like a threat – cinematic terrorism, if you will. If the third installment is anything like its predecessor, cinema-goers might want to start planning their escape routes now. Perhaps it’s time to invest in a good pair of running shoes or learn the art of invisibility.
The very idea of an “Indian 3” is enough to make one consider a career change to professional hermit, living in a cave far from any movie theaters. It’s the cinematic equivalent of saying, “If you thought this was bad, just wait till you see what we do next!”
Final Verdict On Indian 2: A Cinematic Train Wreck for the Ages
“Indian 2” is not just a bad movie; it’s an achievement in awfulness. It’s the kind of film that makes you question not just your taste in movies, but the very nature of existence. It looks like a parody of the original, but without the self-awareness to make it funny. Watching it feels like being stuck in a time loop where every moment is the worst part of a bad movie, replayed ad infinitum.
For those brave (or foolhardy) souls who still want to watch it, consider it an exercise in endurance. You might laugh, but it’ll be the kind of laughter that comes right before crying. The only reason this might be in theaters is to recoup costs – a business decision that viewers will pay for with their time, sanity, and possibly their will to ever watch movies again.
Conclusion (If Any)
For Shankar, Kamal Haasan, and everyone involved, let’s hope this is rock bottom. The only way from here is up – or so we desperately want to believe. Until then, maybe it’s time to rewatch the original “Indian” and pretend this sequel never happened. Or better yet, use the time you would have spent watching “Indian 2” to do literally anything else – stare at a wall, count grains of sand, or contemplate the poor life choices that led you to consider watching this film in the first place.
“Indian 2” ultimately serves as a cautionary tale – reminding us that we should leave some things in the past, and showing that even talented filmmakers and actors can fall victim to the curse of the bad sequel. People will remember this film, not for its quality or message, but as a benchmark that demonstrates how spectacularly a big-budget production can fail. So, if you’re in the mood for a truly unique cinematic experience – one that will leave you questioning the very foundations of filmmaking – then by all means, watch “Indian 2.” Just don’t say we didn’t warn you. And maybe bring a pillow. You’ll need it, either to scream into or to catch some sleep during the more tedious parts. Which, let’s face it, is most of the movie.
Check out more from UnderCop:
- ‘Trap’ Movie Review: A Gripping Thriller That Stumbles in the Final Act
- Manu Bhaker Wins Two Bronze Medal at Paris Olympics
- Robert Downey Jr. Shocks Marvel Fans with Villainous Return as Doctor Doom
- Deadpool & Wolverine Review: A Riotous Resurrection of the MCU?
- Accident or Conspiracy: Godhra Movie Review- A Cinematic Tightrope Walk Through India’s Darkest Hours